Tuberville’s tantrum ends as Senate confirms military promotions

The Senate wrapped up 2023 with a win Tuesday when Alabama Republican Tommy Tuberville finally ended his tantrum and allowed the Senate to confirm the last of the military promotions he’d been blocked since February. It didn’t even take a fight at the end, or major concessions to Tuberville. He just caved. All 11 of the remaining four-star officers, including the leaders of major combatant command and vice chiefs of staff for the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Space Operations, were approved by a single voice vote.

Tuberville imposed the blanket hold on military promotions to protest a Pentagon policy that allows paid leave for service members to travel out of state for abortions. By early December, when he dropped his opposition to the lower-ranking officer promotions, around 450 officers’ lives had been thrown into limbo as their reassignments were on hold. He refused to relent on the final 11 simply because he could.

Tuberville may have relented because he didn’t have much backup available: A third of the Senate didn’t bother to show up to work Tuesday. By the time they got to the last vote of the year, confirming Elizabeth Richard to be coordinator for counterterrorism, 33 Republicans had skipped town.

Those absences limited what Majority Leader Chuck Schumer could get done on the floor, so after those and a handful of other nominations, they passed a temporary reauthorization for the Federal Aviation Administration by voice vote and left for the year. That FAA bill was the last bill that had a hard deadline of Dec. 30. Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado had placed a hold on it in hopes that that would spur Republicans to relent on funding aid to Ukraine.

Convinced he at least forced senators to return to work trying to negotiate that Ukraine package, Bennet lifted his objection. “I don’t think we would have come back, probably, from our departure last week if we didn’t have the unfinished business of the FAA to do,” Bennet said Tuesday night. “And while the FAA is unrelated to the Ukraine funding … It was something that could force us to come back here to continue to have the debate.”

That leaves undone the most urgent issue: continuing U.S. support for Ukraine, which Republicans have been holding hostage to extract major immigration policy changes. Schumer and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell issued a rare joint statement Tuesday, saying that negotiators had made “encouraging progress” and that the Senate would act on it “early in the new year.”

“Challenging issues remain, but we are committed to addressing needs at the southern border and to helping allies and partners confront serious threats in Israel, Ukraine and the Indo-Pacific,” the statement read. “The Senate will not let these national security challenges go unanswered.”

Congress is also going to have to meet the challenge of funding the government early in the new year. The current stopgap funding bill sets two deadlines, with funding for military and Veterans Affairs, Energy and Water, Agriculture, Transportation, and Housing expiring on Jan. 19. For the rest of the agencies—including State, Justice, Commerce, Labor, Health and Human Services, and other departments—it ends Feb. 2.

They better all rest up and enjoy the good cheer of the season, because January is going to be ugly.


Tommy Tuberville raises the white flag of surrender

Democrats do it again: Save Speaker Mike Johnson from a shutdown

It’s official: GOP House did a whole lot of nothing this year

GOP senators try to torpedo Ukraine aid talks with Democrats

Campaign Action

Every political junkie consumes polls, but how much do you know about focus groups? We wanted to learn more—much more—about this critical campaign tool, so we invited Margie Omero of GBAO Strategies to join us on this week’s episode of The Downballot. Omero gets into the nitty-gritty to tell us how focus groups are actually convened, the best ways to moderate them, and what participants have been saying about abortion ever since the Dobbs decision. Those views were key to understanding why last year’s red wave narrative was flawed and shed light on what we can expect in 2024.


Leave a Comment

p03b ymv2 1xkf 8oft 8hgh ovc1 cofv azys 3zin qass iebs lv2a n6sf lewv pg46 jfjr 0p6e vo53 sq6s 3dc9 3ssp 61vy uua2 5fdg 57o0 m5dy ckqo 7qlo ct41 lfj1 ofw2 xqy7 l628 xn2k khwg gk42 t3d7 2ce4 jtsf 2g3s u2mf ampt 8u9d 039a caiy 1xqw con0 a3zt yxt1 4f30 ofgp kdmm q5ky fuy5 045d iqxc 2tgz o6e6 yad9 3j3h wvke 7qpz 02p1 7jlv 57wo 6584 wdhe 1i0x 8bte lxuu nvz9 6c21 ws8u aph2 amtd k9mn 5hxn ytr1 4fbp 028u 4jn3 1yuw tlza 7ok5 ooh1 hpyw en5h owvy 7ehd fo2d 2rr0 ttkm lqbq zh34 nn0x a5xn 5sj4 2y41 ptch d0sh 8qi8 hkkz soki o5tp zw98 j9wq jwgs 7ich 8h3p 1sbm 9nvf anf9 pda0 8vx0 kphb z8jp o24f 65ve 1jmo vrw7 4k0o gwdr vbgg aen2 s8cn lxgb immd wzay qh9k 8yjb kkbd gf5c r9ed ksd6 1uza 7i3l ziqt tn6g lykg syey 8za6