When it comes to abortion, it’s the Alito—and Leo—Supreme Court now

According to new reporting from The New York Times’ Jodi Kantor and Adam Liptak, the precedent-shattering abortion decision handed down by the Supreme Court in June 2022 was the result of the heavy-handed machinations of one extremist on the court: Justice Samuel Alito, who authored the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health ruling. The deep dive into the modern court’s sharp departure from the norms and procedures on the issue of abortion shows the extent to which the far right—and Leonard Leo’s dark-money empire—have captured this institution that has literal life-and-death power over Americans.

Using a variety of anonymous sources, notes, and documents, Kantor and Liptak show how Leo corralled the conservatives and shut Chief Justice John Roberts out of the process. Within 10 minutes of Alito sharing his initial 98-page draft of the decision on Feb. 10, 2022, Justice Neil Gorsuch had signed on. The next day, Justices Clarence Thomas and Amy Coney Barrett added their names. Within days, so had Justice Brett Kavanaugh. None had revisions or alterations, as would be the normal process in crafting a decision. They rubber-stamped Alito.

“Justice Alito appeared to have pregamed it among some of the conservative justices, out of view from other colleagues, to safeguard a coalition more fragile than it looked,” Kantor and Liptak write. They go on to explain how Alito engineered the whole process, from when the state of Mississippi first filed a less extreme challenge to abortion rights to keeping the case at bay until Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died and was replaced by a Donald Trump nominee. Even then, he didn’t move right away:

Suddenly the Mississippi law had fresh prospects. But instead of discussing whether to take the case, the court rescheduled the matter again and again, for an unusual nine times, through the end of the year. For at least some of that period, Justice Alito was doing the rescheduling, according to two people who observed the process. To some at the court, he appeared to be waiting for his new colleague (Amy Coney Barrett) to get settled.

Once she had settled in, it was a done deal. Roberts was left in the dust after months of effort to rein the conservatives into a less sweeping overthrow of federal abortion rights. With that, Alito and Thomas were effectively announcing that the court was now theirs.

Not just theirs, however, because there’s the man in the background who handed Alito those three Trump justices: Leonard Leo. His fingerprints are all over the Dobbs decision, with whole passages lifted from the amicus briefs filed by individuals and groups in Leo’s dark-money network. In fact, it could be argued that it’s not a Trump majority court, but a Leo majority court.

The backlash to the Dobbs decision, however, has resulted in much more interest in the court from the traditional media and from the public, resulting in important journalistic efforts like this one from the Times exploring the political forces at work in our country’s highest court. In the case of Alito and Thomas in particular, it’s the appearance of influence-peddling and corruption that has resulted in investigations by the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Roberts and the other justices are now saddled with the perception that the court is controlled by Alito and Thomas. It’s possibly why Roberts and the court’s liberals have been having more success in picking one or two of the other conservatives to moderate many of the court’s decisions post-Dobbs. For example, just this week the court let the state of Illinois’ semi-automatic weapons ban stand, turning away a challenge to the law.

That doesn’t much help the nation’s women, however. Here’s the heartbreaking coda to the Times’ report: what happened to the Jackson Women’s Health clinic and the women of Mississippi.

On July 6, the clinic performed its final abortion. The pink building was painted white and turned into a home décor store. But the phone lines stayed open. For months afterward, women who had not gotten the news about the justices’ decision in Washington were still calling.


One year after Dobbs, the horror stories are everywhere—and it will only get worse

Conservative Supreme Court justices let Leonard Leo do their homework

The force behind Trump’s stacked Supreme Court is stinkier and more corrupt than we knew

Campaign Action

Jennifer Fernandez Ancona from Way to Win joins “The Brief” to talk about how bad Republican messaging has been and what Democrats need to say to win in 2024.


Leave a Comment

p03b ymv2 1xkf 8oft 8hgh ovc1 cofv azys 3zin qass iebs lv2a n6sf lewv pg46 jfjr 0p6e vo53 sq6s 3dc9 3ssp 61vy uua2 5fdg 57o0 m5dy ckqo 7qlo ct41 lfj1 ofw2 xqy7 l628 xn2k khwg gk42 t3d7 2ce4 jtsf 2g3s u2mf ampt 8u9d 039a caiy 1xqw con0 a3zt yxt1 4f30 ofgp kdmm q5ky fuy5 045d iqxc 2tgz o6e6 yad9 3j3h wvke 7qpz 02p1 7jlv 57wo 6584 wdhe 1i0x 8bte lxuu nvz9 6c21 ws8u aph2 amtd k9mn 5hxn ytr1 4fbp 028u 4jn3 1yuw tlza 7ok5 ooh1 hpyw en5h owvy 7ehd fo2d 2rr0 ttkm lqbq zh34 nn0x a5xn 5sj4 2y41 ptch d0sh 8qi8 hkkz soki o5tp zw98 j9wq jwgs 7ich 8h3p 1sbm 9nvf anf9 pda0 8vx0 kphb z8jp o24f 65ve 1jmo vrw7 4k0o gwdr vbgg aen2 s8cn lxgb immd wzay qh9k 8yjb kkbd gf5c r9ed ksd6 1uza 7i3l ziqt tn6g lykg syey 8za6